One of the reasons so many editors only do invitation only projects is a small group of writers who just insist on never-ending arguments with the editor. They don't seem to get that if an editor doesn't like their story, that's the editor's right. A few days ago I didn't like a title as it's almost the same as a major movie. Such titles are spent as readers will expect a tie in and get angry when there isn't one. Some people may think such plays are cute--I do not.So I rejected it and said the title made me decide not to even read the story. Anyway, I got a reply arguing with me about it. It's not the writer's decision. It is mine and it does not matter if it is fair, it is still not up to the writer. The writer is free to take his crappy title somewhere else. Then I got another angry response and invoked the death penalty--that any future submissions will be discarded unread. I hope that will end the matter. If the writer wants to do a shootout, I have a .357 ready to go and we can shoot it out any time.
As if to further make me wish I had kept things invitation only, I got yet another story, this one using a Star Trek phrase as a title.It was rejected unread as well, although I haven't gotten any sass on this one.
So, buckaroo, if you're an aspiring author, and you are boiling mad at some editor for rejecting your wonderful story, arguing with the editor will accomplish nothing. And you may want to mail me a box with a rattlesnake in it, but do remember that can work both ways.